“Stanbic Bank Tanzania is to be restructured to return the business to
profitability and has taken decisive action to improve the bank’s
performance. It received capital injection of Sh24 billion ($15
million) from its parent, Standard Bank Group, on 31 July 2013 to
ensure smooth and stable operations of the bank,”
Dar es Salaam. A Harvard-tailored banking
scheme that was fully controlled from Santiago, Chile, has cost Stanbic
a loss of Sh15 billion, The Citizen has reliably learnt.
Standard
Bank (Stanbic) bought the banking product made in Harvard and
introduced it at the busy Kariakoo market -- despite protests from its
local top management -- in the hope that it would boost its presence
and profit. Attracted by the multimillion-shilling transactions at
Kariakoo everyday, Stanbic gave traders in the busy inner city Sh18
billion-worth of unsecured loans last year.
The
only collateral that was needed to borrow money was that the applicant
undergo a psychometric analysis The test is a method by which a person
can sense or “read” the history of an object by touching it. Banks and
other organisations use psychometric analysis to find out the most able
and best suited persons for a job or course of study.
In
the case of Stanbic Tanzania, the computerised system was used to
identify the best and worst people to give the loans to. A total of
Sh18 billion was issued to Kariakoo traders on the basis of the system.
Another Sh26 billion was issued as personal loans to company employees,
with just the salary slip as collateral.
The
former had a loss ratio of 83 per cent while the latter had loss ratio
of 65 per cent, sources say. The psychometric analysis gave Stanbic 83
percent loss ranking, meaning the bank suffered Sh15 billion loss in
2012/13. Altogether, the bank lost Sh31 billion.
Kariakoo
traders took advantage of the bank’s laxity in loans management,
especially after learning that their loans were being managed from
Kampala in Uganda. Stanbic officially announced a Sh14.9 billion loss
during the quarter ending September 2013, according to its latest
financial statement.
This
is just a continuation of the bank’s poor show which began last year
and which sources say is a result of remote control of the
institution’s operations from its hub in South Africa and from Stanbic
Uganda.
The
Citizen has reliably established that when Standard Group wanted to
introduce the Harvard-tailored product, the local team in Tanzania
strongly rejected the move, citing serious risks that could eventually
hurt the bank financially.
According
to reliable sources within the Bank, Standard Group overruled the local
managers and tasked the Stanbic Uganda to spearhead the entire loan
process.
Our
source said: “The head and respective teams under Stanbic Tanzania’s
personal and business banking department reported directly to South
Africa with no reporting to the local CEO/MD. Business strategy for
customers, products and credit loans were directly rolled out of
Johannesburg with very little input from management of Stanbic Tanzania
and any interference or resistance was treated as dissent and
disciplinary action was taken.”
The
psychometric test was done out of Santiago in Chile. Traders did not
need to have a bank account to access the loans while credit approval
and booking of the loans was done out of Stanbic Uganda, with no input
from Tanzania. The collection of the loans was also done out of Stanbic
Uganda.
According
to sources, there were no limits in place to monitor the ageing process
of these loans that were issued through the Personal and Business
Banking—a situation that resulted in misleading data.
The Citizen wrote to Stanbic management three times seeking a response to the claims, but the bank kept mum.
Witch-hunting begins
When
Stanbic, which operated profitably in the past few years, abruptly
became a loss-making entity because of its rush to introduce unsecured
loans, the bank’s headquarters embarked on a witch-hunt, according to
reliable sources.
The
losses have become a reason for mistrust, with headquarters trying to
figure out who might have been behind the poor show. This has resulted
in the transfer of former Managing Director Bashir Awale and the
dismissal of some senior managers who worked closely with him.
Mr
Awale will be remembered for running the bank profitably at some point
in his seven-year tenure and for facilitating the closing of a $600
million amortisation private placement on behalf of Tanzania. He was in
May this year reportedly transferred to Kenya to take up a new position
as the Regional Investment Bank Executive for East Africa as well as
Ethiopia and South Sudan.
It
is not clear, though, why he did not take up his new position. His
departure set off an exodus of staff and the sacking of senior managers
believed to have been close to him during his tenure as the MD.
He
told The Citizen last week: “I am no longer with the bank, but I hope
one day the truth will come out. What pains me is the fact that those
who questioned the unsecured loan scheme but were ignored are the ones
being targeted today.” He declined to give more details, saying that
since he was no longer working with Stanbic, he was not in a position
to disclose further financial details.
When
The Citizen tried to get the bank’s side of the story, Acting Managing
Director Paul Omara said: “Stanbic Bank Tanzania does not divulge
details of internal HR processes, in keeping with Standard Bank Group
policy.”
He
neither admitted nor denied the numerous claims of remotely-controlling
the management of the bank, specifically the personal and business
banking department, from South Africa and Uganda but quipped: “Stanbic
Bank Tanzania has stringent and robust processes in place to comply
with the fiduciary and regulatory laws as set by the government of
Tanzania”.
With
the loss going public as required by laws governing the banking sector
in Tanzania, Mr Omara said the bank was doing all it could to return to
profitability. One of the ways being employed, he said, is the
injection of a $15 million capital from the parent company, the
Standard Bank Group.
“Stanbic
Bank Tanzania is to be restructured to return the business to
profitability and has taken decisive action to improve the bank’s
performance. It received capital injection of Sh24 billion ($15
million) from its parent, Standard Bank Group, on 31 July 2013 to
ensure smooth and stable operations of the bank,” he said.
But
he maintained his silence on pressing issues that are said to have
turned the once profitable bank into a loss-making entity and triggered
reshuffles within the management structures.
There are claims that in its heyday, the bank had only three expatriates on board but, following the huge loss in recent months, Stanbic has brought in about 20 expatriates in an attempt to turn around the bank.
There are claims that in its heyday, the bank had only three expatriates on board but, following the huge loss in recent months, Stanbic has brought in about 20 expatriates in an attempt to turn around the bank.
No comments:
Post a Comment